REEFLECTIONS said:is there a corelation with softies and sand, if you keep lps is sand the better way to go, or is it just that you might not want to use sand with sps?
blange3 said:REEFLECTIONS said:is there a corelation with softies and sand, if you keep lps is sand the better way to go, or is it just that you might not want to use sand with sps?
It's more that many SPS thrive in very low nutrient environments, which are easier to achieve and maintain without sand.
There is some benefit to softies from the microfauna that multiply in the sandbed, especially if you give it a good stir now and again.
agent007 said:I really do like the look of the sand - when its relatively clean - but it seems I'm loosing that ability.
I think most of my sand snails (Nassarius snd Ceriths) have died or will die shortly. I can relocate the live
ones to the fug. I am concerned about my LPS and soft corals though. Can hammer, frogspawn and open brain coral survive with in a BB tank?
agent007 said:agent007 said:Can hammer, frogspawn and open brain coral survive with in a BB tank?
Absolutely- I raised this brain coral from near death to full recovery in a Bare bottom frag tank
The way my tank is setup, it would really benefit if I could crank up the water flow but there is a limit when
you have SB. Is there anyway I can keep a BB with the coral I have?
You can keep any corals with either option of substrate. However, keep in mind that with SB, you are correct in being creative with the positioning of water flow. Tom has his numerous powerheads aimed at the surface which creates turbulence within the tank and indirectly to the sand bed. He has it positioned so that water flow is max within the water columnn. In time, a Sand bed will get slightly "packed" which comes with age. Older/mature sand beds will be able to handle a good amount of flow, given it is indirect from the powerheads.
I have kept bubble coral, elegance coral, pumping Xenia and open brains in my tank with no substrate, but they did not like the amount of flow since my tank was pretty much blasted continuously. I was able to keep them happy by placing a rock in the water flow's path, or keeping them completely away from the current's direction. A more random flow instead of linear is also preferred, mimicking the natural ebb and flow of reef currents in the reef.
Here's Phyl's Scoly story associated with water flow-
http://www.njreefers.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=26&topic=11597.0
concept3 said:yikes- that quote and answer didnt go quite as planned
chaoscat said:I'm wrestling with this decision now myself as I'm setting up a new tank. It sounds like a bare bottom would be easier to maintain. But, I'd also like to be able to keep wrasses and gobies that need that sandbed. I've always run my tanks with a Jaubert plenum on the bottom and had no algae issues, BUT, I've never had one of these run continuously for much more than 2 years. Plus, the aragonite grade is probably too course for these animals.
Argggh. I'm frozen with indecision on this frigging tank. What to put on the bottom of the tank? What to put in the sump? I'm very close to just trying to set my sump up as a plenum system, but I don't know how well that's going to work with 400-500 gph running through it.
When is this hobby going to get easy?
REEFLECTIONS said:so does anyone keep lps such as hammers/torches/frogspawns with a bare bottom? i know zoos, shrooms, and rics are ok, but are all?
pnoyreefer said:I have a starboard bottom on my 180g and its been up for 2 1/2 yrs and the advantage I have is I can max all my flow without creating any sandstorm and also easy to mentain. The only downside is I can keep some wrasses which I would love to have on my reef tank .