I am going to preface this with the fact that by no means am I a chemist or can understand the formulas and whatnot, but here goes. I think some of the consensus on phosphate remover has been dogma for so long people will not challenge it even though it might be wrong. This might not be the thread for this but, the common thought is GFO over aluminium because aluminum will leak back phosphate into the water and drops it too fast. Everyone has switched over to GFO and moved on. However I was doing some reading and one person chimed in that aluminum would only leak back phosphate at something like 5.0 to 6.0 ph which means you would have much bigger problems on your hands. Also, GFO might be leaking iron back into your tank which spurs on algae growth. Ever get very low phosphate readings but algae growth is taking off? We have always said, the algae if just hiding the reading but what if you really do have zero phosphates and your GFO is feeding the algae? Ethan from AO brought this to my attention and I think I may try the Seachem product for a while and see if there are any changes. Ethan has swapped a few people already and has shown excellect results. What does that have to do with this system? Not running GFO. Not going to get into lanthanum, but I have heard if done correctly it will control your phosphate better than any additive on the market.