• Folks, if you've recently upgraded or renewed your annual club membership but it's still not active, please reach out to the BOD or a moderator. The PayPal system has a slight bug which it doesn't allow it to activate the account on it's own.

Kati Ani vs RO/DI

Can someone help me better understand the differences between Kati Ani and RO/DI?

These are the ones I know of:

Kati Ani is more expensive on initial purchase.

Kati Ani produces no waste water.

Kati Ani has re-chargeable resins.
 
Yeah contact Bruce (he is Kati Ani). But here the quick answer; most RO/DI use a filtering membrane and then a what's called a "mixed bed" DI (deioninzing resins). The Kati Ani system just seprates the "mixed bed" into 2 separate chambers and has no filtering membrane. This makes it possible to recharge the resisns after they have been used up.
 
I guess I am looking for the pros and the cons of both.

Kati Ani sounds like in the long term it will save you money and eliminates water waste.

However, most people use RO/DI.

I have to believe there is a reason behind that.

I will talk to Bruce, but I was hoping to receive input from others experiences.
 

Phyl

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
If your tap water has a low hardness reading then you're a good candidate for using Kati-Ani. Otherwise you'll burn through the resin and need to recharge more often. I think most people use RO/DI because it is easy, cheap and "disposable". The better solution is definitely kati-ani if it is in your budget and you are comfortable with the recharge process. I'm sure Malulu, who has used the system or Bruce can explain that to you better.
 
I understand the cost difference to be the upfront cost vs the long term savings.

RO/DI cheaper to purchase. KATI/ANI cheaper in the long term.

I am actually surprised more are not using KATI/ANI, although I do understand the chemicals may make people nervous.
 

mikem

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
They are both about the same up front cost. Unless you need one for 1000 gallons a day.
 
Mike can you expand on that? I guess it really depends on how much you are putting into your RO/DI unit.

Are you assuming a dual membrane unit?
 

mikem

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
I can't quote his pricing, but I was going to get a 100gpd RO/DI unit. The KA 100gpd was about the same price. You'll have to talk to Bruce on the exact pricing tho.
The reason most of us aren't using it yet is because we have a perfectly good working RO/DI unit. So spending the money for a KA is not an option at this point until our RO/DI craps out. I can assure you that my next unit will be a KA.
 

malulu

NJRC Member
using Cati-Ani
pros:
- save water (no waste)
- make clean water fast! output rate 12 gals per hour

cons:
- you need to deal with chemicals (muriatic acid and Sodium Hydroxide - Food Grade), need to wear protection gear (for eye and hand), not really a big deal, but with small children around, need to really really pay super extra attention...

note:
(1)
- like Phyl mentioned, if you have high GH (general water hardness) and TDS input - no good!!
- i have the cati-ani unit 5, it is rated for 6,000g for GH=1.
- I was estimate to recharge every 6 months! and due to my high GH=34+ (normal is in 5 to 7) and TDS near 600, i end up with recharge for less than 100g output!
- for the past 6 months, may be someone else complained, the input was down to TDS=220+ (i did not re-measure the GH), i now can last about 3 months per charge (about 600g).

(2)
your current setup may need to be change - you can not use the RO/DI hookup to just connect it to the Cati-Ani unit, details can be find in the below thread: (and yes, i supposed to updated with the latest, and may be i will some time soon...) :-[
http://www.njreefers.org/joomla/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=26&topic=8973.0;topicseen
 
I"ll add a little here.....The Kati Ani is much more popular in Europe where water waste is taboo. In the US, RO systems were often used in home water filtration, whereas DI was used in labs. To create pure water for reefs, people turned to what they were familiar with - RO. RO/DI vs KA DI both produce similar purity since the final "polishing" stage in both is DI. I consider the initial costs similar. The basic Kati Ani costs $227 and purifies almost 400 gallons per day. The increased model sizes only reduce the frequency of regeneration, they all purify at the same rate. But, the ongoing costs to produce was are very different. For my personal water conditions and costs, the ongoing costs for RO/DI would be over $.07 per gallons whereas the KA DI costs less than half a cent per gallon.

Phyllis was correct in stating that the harder the water, the more often you need to regenerate. But, also the more often you need to replace items in the RO/DI scenario as well. David has the highest TDS of any customer I have and he initially gave the KA back to me due to the frequent regenerations. Then he wanted it back. The owner of the plant in Germany that makes Kati Ani says there is a place in Switzerland that has at least 750 TDS and the only purification that anyone uses in that area is Kati Ani. Hope this helps.
 

malulu

NJRC Member
Bruce K said:
... David (Malulu) has the highest TDS of any customer I have and he initially gave the KA back to me due to the frequent regenerations. Then he wanted it back...

yes, that is correct! and i am now a happy customer.

by the way, it is about time for me to recharge the unit, may be this coming Sunday Oct 4th. (you can tell by looking at the media inside the unit, and/or by using a TDS meter to check the output, no guessing required.)

Dave, if you are interested to see what/how i connected it as of now, you are welcome to stop by to take a look (Green Brook, NJ 08812), just PM me your contact info, i will reply with my cell# or call you to arrange a time, we may be able to work out a schedule to see how i did the regeneration. (about 3 hours total time)
 
Top