• Folks, if you've recently upgraded or renewed your annual club membership but it's still not active, please reach out to the BOD or a moderator. The PayPal system has a slight bug which it doesn't allow it to activate the account on it's own.

POSSABLE MAJOR CHANGES TO OUR HOBBY......

I have mixed feelings about attempts to limit collecting. Like many other issues, there is no simple solution.

Yes, I'd like to see more captive breeding, but so far, only a few species have been bread in commercial quantities. Most of them are smaller fish. Being able to breed and raise fish like tangs and angles is sort of the "holy grail", and to my knowledge is not able to be done commercially. For many fish, they still need to be gotten the hard way, by collecting them.

Setting limits is actually a good idea. If we wipe out a species on the reef, we no longer can collect it for our tanks. While I don't want to see the price of yellow tangs go to $100, I also agree with the others about the number that are sold to people not prepared to care for them. We saw a similar thing when "Finding Nemo" came out. Many people with no experience wanted a "nemo" and a "dory", and quality of both species went way down for years. High prices do tend to stop people from making quick purchases.

There are also many species still collected that should just be left in the ocean. Cleaner wrasse comes to mind. They are almost impossible to keep in a home sized tank. I wouldn't mind seeing a ban on fish like this.

I think the best thing we can do is to support regulation of collecting, but make sure the regulations make sense. All to often there are political forces at work that either want no regulation at all or want to shut everything down. We need to keep a balance.
 
I think support of the bill would be good. Conservation is a good thing.

Most of my live stock are either aquacultured frags or tank breed. The only thing that wasn't available locally was the rock.
 
Here is the latest revision of the bill in question. The last line which states it will take effect in the 2050 is probably a good indication that it's dead.

The first few pages are interesting reading. I like the approach they are taking of reserving 30%-35% of the coastline for safe zones. It sounds like it is working in the spots they implemented it.

SB3225
 
If someone already stated this, I'm sorry for the repeat. I think the bill is necessary and it might make alot of people think before they buy... if not for the fish's sake then for their own. Too many people in this hobby have little respect for life and feel that if a cheap fish ( such as a small yellow tang) dies, they can easily go buy another one or ten without impact.
 
harlequinreef said:
If someone already stated this, I'm sorry for the repeat. I think the bill is necessary and it might make alot of people think before they buy... if not for the fish's sake then for their own. Too many people in this hobby have little respect for life and feel that if a cheap fish ( such as a small yellow tang) dies, they can easily go buy another one or ten without impact.

I think it bears repeating frequently! ;)

I've also been concerned lately with the number of folks posting on this board asking for information about a coral they have already purchased and admit to knowing nothing about.

We do keep living things in our tanks and when we bring them into our homes we are accepting responsibility for their well being.

We all really need to make sure we understand the requirements of any living thing we purchase before making the purchase.
 
Top