Curious if anyone has tried using Prodibio yet,specifically BIO-DIGEST and REEF-BOOSTER. If so, what were your results?
phil519 said:I can't speak to REEFBOOSTER, but...(the 411 on b-digest):
"BIO DIGEST is composed with nitrifying and dénitrifying bacterial strains selected for their capacity to transform the ammonia into nitrites, the nitrites into nitrates and nitrates into nitrogen. They are guaranteed free from genetic mutations."
Everything mentioned above I already accomplish via a quality amount of liverock, macroalgae, skimmming and water changes. No comment on the genetic mutations... ;D
I've also read about a couple experienced reefers (Melev is one) over on RC that have tried it but had mixed results. (He saw fantastic growth on some of his corals, but others also died rapidly, and ended up not using it anymore). What's a little mystifying is the claim that you cannot OD on the bac, yet Melev was convinced his corals died because of an OD. Now I think he used bio-reef and biotopin so your results may not be similar.
Then again, every tank has different lights, water volume, etc etc., it's really almost impossible to truly replicate someone else's results. Not everyone can dose exactly at the prescribed times - so it's easy to see (as Carlo noted) that "crashes" could be coming from any number of factors (prodibio or just bad husbandry).
I think the jury is still out whether prodibio is the magic panacea that all SPS keepers want to control their nitrates. So do the research, draw your own conclusions, and as always may the buyer beware!
hayabusa2003 said:..it all depends on which one I win at the frag swap raffle![]()
Yea, definitely a space issue. I've seen some creative ideas on this one. Same as with top-off buckets. Some people put a large size bucket/trashcan next to the tank with a doyle over it to hide it. While creative it's still a space issue.hayabusa2003 said:Carlo,
I did consider the 5gallon buckets idea originally when I was setting up my system, but it's not very aesthetic since I have no place to hide the stuff. Now if only my girlfriend would let me break thru the wall behind the display tank into my garage...
Yep, true. I wouldn't add any more sand to the fuge as it's deep enough already.to clear things up, I have 1 tank (75gal) with a 4-5in sandbed. I have a 20gal DIY sump/fuge where I have my skimmer, 6-7in of oolite sand (different size than I have in the display tank), and chaeto. My goal is to remove most of the sand from the display tank. I could add the sand to my fuge, but any more than 8in in one area is overkill. With that said, if I remove sand from my display, unless I add another fuge to put the sand in (or make a 40gal fuge), I'm actually reducing my bio-filtration.
That would seem to be the case. I don't think you mentioned how you skim (wet/dry). If you currently dry skim you could try more of a wet skim. This should pull more organics out of the system. Yep it will pull some of the salts out of the water also but you can look at the wet skim replacement water as something like a "continuous water change". You could top-off with slightly salted water to cover both evap and skim loss getting some of the salts back in the water or just occasionally check and adjust your salt level. Depends on how often you do water changes. But the point being a wet skim will remove more stuff before they have a chance to break down.As for my 0ppm readings, I think that's misleading. My chaeto has been growing pretty quickly...wouldn't that suggest that my filtration isn't removing the nutrients fast enough, hence the macro-algae is consuming it and growing? Prodibio users actually report that their macro-algae stopped growing and/or start dying..a sign of a truly nutrient-poor system.
Depends on how you look at it. You could look at it from the perspective of the "continuous water change" idea above. Done like that it's not really wasteful as you don't need to do the big water changes per say depending on the amount of water you skim out each day/week. But generally speaking I'm not a fan of big time overskimming.Lastly..perhaps this should be a separate thread..I could upgrade my skimmer (looking at a EuroReef RS-135 or RS-180)...reducing the demand on my biological filtration. But..what are you thoughts on overskimming? Don't you think it's wasteful..the fact that we spend all this money adding trace elements/etc to our system, only to have an over-sized skimmer suck most of it out anyway...kinda like running the A/C with the windows open![]()