Thanks art! That would be great.I can see if my brother could figure out something, he's a programmer of some sort
I can see if my brother could figure out something, he's a programmer of some sort
I'll see what I can find out.does anyone have contacts over at R2R? I am wondering if they are getting hit like us? I compared our registration page to their and it seems like both sites are using the same settings.
Cant you not allow postings until an admin approves a new user? It would save you tons of spamming and time...no approval unless they respond.
With the board as dead as it is...this is a bad idea. Don't give people extra annoying steps to become a member. I know I would just cancel the membership if I had to answer questions.
The issue I see is that there are roughly 50-60 people signing up with about 1/2 getting through and spamming. How will we know who is a "real" member. Seeming like it would take more time to me.
A very busy baseball site I have used for years does it this way. You can just look at their info to know if they are approved without questions if you like. Seeing 10 spam threads will drive people away too...
I can see both sides to this. I do my best keeping up with it but I can't be on all day and night. I think all options need to be looked at before a decision is made. Maybe the spam scanner (or whatever) it is can be upgraded or the criteria made stricter?That is a good point.
I feel a decision like that should be up to the BOD. @kschweer what are your thoughts?
The struggle is real!!!I've got a serious concern in this matter.
If we close up the arbitrary postings, where am I going to go to be able to order a sexual enhancement drug that also cleans my floors as described in broken English at 6am?