• Folks, if you've recently upgraded or renewed your annual club membership but it's still not active, please reach out to the BOD or a moderator. The PayPal system has a slight bug which it doesn't allow it to activate the account on it's own.

T5 Hybrid suggestions

Mark_C

Staff member
Officer Emeritus
NJRC Member
Moderator
Running 3 Hydra 26HDs over a 100g tank (4'x2'x2'ish) in a 36" ATI hybrid mount (4 bulb).
Recently ran a blue+, coral+, purple+, and a UV, as my first go. OK growth, decent coloring, but low flourescence and minimal pop.
Now its time to change bulbs.
Was thinking...
Blue+, Blue+, Purple+, Blue+
or
Blue+, Blue+, Purple+, Coral+
or
Blue+, Blue+, Blue+, Coral+ (I've read the coral+ covers most of the purple spectrum and drops in a bit of red as well)

Any suggestions based on experiences?
I'm running mostly SPS at this point.
 
Sure it’s no help. But I found that the UV. Makes the greens really glow. But to be honest I don’t know how it effects growth either negatively or positively
 
I use 2 coral + and 2 blue + T5s. I have tried the purple and the actinic. I find when I use 1 bulb of a color, it never looks right as they shadow or only light half the tank. I also turn on the 2 blues first, and then the 2 coral + later. I turn off the whites first and then the blues last. But, my tank has a side-to-side and front-to-back frame above that leaves shadows with single lights, so an open tank might not have that problem. I also use 2 current marine LED strip light front and back as well. And I tend to have soft corals and don't select corals based on maximum florescent ability - my tank is more of a fish tank with easy-to-keep corals. I note that the purple plus has a red peak, which might be useful for some red colored coral that don't fluoresce.
 

Mark_C

Staff member
Officer Emeritus
NJRC Member
Moderator
Sponge, I'm using the Hydras to supply some decent UV atm and its working well
MrX, hadn't considered the true actinic, after 30 mins research, its definitely in the mix, cheers
Mark, I have the coral+ as a possible. Its hard to run pairs as I do want to cover a number of spectrums on only 4 bulbs.

So far, front to back...
Blue+
Blue+
Actinic*
Blue+**

* ATI does a True Actinic whereas Geissman does a Super Actinic. They both hit 400-450 with the ATI at a 0.6 relative intensity v. Geissmans 1.0 intensity
Anyone have any thoughts on ATI v. Geissman actinics?

**I can change this out for a Coral+ but dont need the extra red, plus I'm wary this may add a bit too much white, any thoughts welcome
 
Last edited:
I see little by my eye to adding any red. And red can promote algae as it tends to run in the spectrum it likes. Unless YOU can see a visual advantage. I would avoid it. But these other fellas seem like they are pointing in the BEST direction. I’m just sharing antidotal visual opinion on my tank.
 

Mark_C

Staff member
Officer Emeritus
NJRC Member
Moderator
Thanks for that Diana.
Based on the profile of the Coral+ I think its out, will most likely go with 3 blue+ and 1 actinic.
 

Mark_C

Staff member
Officer Emeritus
NJRC Member
Moderator
Decision made.

From front to back...
ATI Blue+
Geissman Super Actinic
ATI Aquablue Special (full spectrum, more white)
ATI Blue+

Thanks for the info folks.

Also snagged some new RODI filters and, egads!, a Hanna Alk checker (yes, I'm starting to actually monitor, Im sure this is where it all goes to #%$@)
 
Last edited:
Top