• Folks, if you've recently upgraded or renewed your annual club membership but it's still not active, please reach out to the BOD or a moderator. The PayPal system has a slight bug which it doesn't allow it to activate the account on it's own.

Old Bulbs Cause Algae - Fact or Fiction??

So what if the algae doesn't improve....or what if it gets worse. Then should we conclude that new bulbs cause nuisance algae.

It has been my experience that we are quick to hold up "proof" for the theories that we have already concluded are true, and similarly dismiss evidence when it contradicts our pre-conceived conclusions.
 
Dave said:
So what if the algae doesn't improve....or what if it gets worse. Then should we conclude that new bulbs cause nuisance algae.

It has been my experience that we are quick to hold up "proof" for the theories that we have already concluded are true, and similarly dismiss evidence when it contradicts our pre-conceived conclusions.

If this happens then I would first look into my water parameters to see if they have deteriorated. If they haven't changed at all, then I guess it would safe to assume that the bulbs caused the algae growth.

Without getting into a real scientific experiment, which I cannot do myself, there really is no way to tell.

I was given this link....it's a very interesting read regarding lighting:

http://www.reef-eden.net/lighting.htm
 
9supratt4 said:
I was given this link....it's a very interesting read regarding lighting:

http://www.reef-eden.net/lighting.htm

So if we are to assume that the data in this link is accurate, the spectral shift that has been talked about would be limited to flourescent lighting.

While all bulbs lose PAR (which of course presents a different problem), nuisance algae relating to old bulbs should not occur with MH bulbs if we assume spectral shift is the cause.

Of course, I am not stating the link is accurate, but paraphrasing its content.
 
I am in agreeance after much reading and research that Flourescent lights (PC, T8, T5) have the spectral shift to red and that Metal Halide lights over time lose their PAR rating.

So do old lights cause algae growth....the jury is still out. I can see why the flourescent bulbs would make it ideal for nusiance algae growth, but now with this other info I do not see anywhere that MH bulbs would make it ideal since there is no spectral shift in wavelengths.
 
9supratt4 said:
I am in agreeance after much reading and research that Flourescent lights (PC, T8, T5) have the spectral shift to red and that Metal Halide lights over time lose their PAR rating.

So do old lights cause algae growth....the jury is still out. I can see why the flourescent bulbs would make it ideal for nusiance algae growth, but now with this other info I do not see anywhere that MH bulbs would make it ideal since there is no spectral shift in wavelengths.

But of course, there are few that run JUST MH's without a T5 supplement, correct?
 
JRWOHLER said:
I think that it can be a piece to the puzzle. Power compacts seem to be the biggest culprits.

For me MH and to a lesser degree T5 I think par decline is most important.
For PC I think wavelength and algae blooms problems are most important.
T5 can change wavelength also but think par decline is more significant.

Certainly if you are running a tank with zero nutrients you can put a plant bulb over the tank and it won't matter nothing will grow....so as you stated it is all a piece of the puzzle.

For beginners, PC is often their first choice in lights due to cost, suddenly after 9 months start seeing an algae bloom, the diagnosis of old bulbs is probably fitting.

Agreed, my PC bulbs always caused a bloom when they went bad. I switched them out for T5's and haven't had the problem.
 
Another question regarding this topic came to mind. If a spectral shift benefits the growth of algae, wouldn't it also help zooanthellae?
 

Tazmaniancowboy

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
I've been following this curious topic since you posted and have something to throw in there. Although I have no algae, I have had cyano for about7 months or so. And as I post this I just realized my bulbs are much older than I thought they were! OOPS. Anyway, I was battling it for a long time until recently, For the last two months my goal has pretty much to keep it under control not eradicate it. The only reason for this was planning, gathering materials for a BIG water change and time. I do not think this has been mentioned or if it is even helpful, but shaded areas in my tank have/get no cyano?

Coincidence or not, I had a medium sized monti-cap fall the other night onto the sandbed. It landed upright and due to it's size no direct light shined around the perimeter of the base(shadow). This was in an area of heavy cyano the day before and now that area in the shadow has none.

Also interesting and worth noting, I did a lights out for 2 days in my reef where the cyano was and left the light on in my FOWLR directly across the room, but tied together in the basement sump, and low an behold the cyano jumped tanks! There had not been a visible trace in there for months until it was attracted to the light source!

I can't wait for the bulb buy so I can change out the bulbs and rid myself of this crap.

Taz
 
Taz,

Can you help me understand why you feel the new bulbs will resolve the issue?

It sounds as if you are saying the only time the issue goes away, is when the impacted area is dark.
 
Very interesting topic indeed.

Dave...in regards to your question about zooanthellae. I believe zooanthellae uses a different light spectrum than nusiance algae.

In Taz's post....that is very interested. It is believed that Cyano feeds off of light, but I don't think new bulbs will cause the cyano to disappear....there are many other underlying issues with cyano.
 

Tazmaniancowboy

Officer Emeritus
Officer Emeritus
Sorry I wasn't clear enough Dave. What I meant is that it is one step in the right direction and I am curious to see what is going to happen. Again because of the age of my bulbs and the fact that I have been battling it for months, I do believe it plays a big role. My phosphates tested .04 last week and seem to stay there. I may even forgo the huge waterchange that I had planned and do regular one to see if the new bulbs would have any impact. As long as my phos stays the same and my coral or fish are not in danger, I'll leave it alone to simply change bulbs and see what happens. Just a test for curiosity, although I know I will need to siphon out the crap and do a big WC to be rid of it.

Taz
 
Well if you can hold off without jeapordizing your tank, it would certainly be interesting to see the impact.
 
Top