JRWOHLER said:See all we needed was a lazy reefer to prove it. ;D
Dave said:So what if the algae doesn't improve....or what if it gets worse. Then should we conclude that new bulbs cause nuisance algae.
It has been my experience that we are quick to hold up "proof" for the theories that we have already concluded are true, and similarly dismiss evidence when it contradicts our pre-conceived conclusions.
9supratt4 said:I was given this link....it's a very interesting read regarding lighting:
http://www.reef-eden.net/lighting.htm
9supratt4 said:I am in agreeance after much reading and research that Flourescent lights (PC, T8, T5) have the spectral shift to red and that Metal Halide lights over time lose their PAR rating.
So do old lights cause algae growth....the jury is still out. I can see why the flourescent bulbs would make it ideal for nusiance algae growth, but now with this other info I do not see anywhere that MH bulbs would make it ideal since there is no spectral shift in wavelengths.
JRWOHLER said:I think that it can be a piece to the puzzle. Power compacts seem to be the biggest culprits.
For me MH and to a lesser degree T5 I think par decline is most important.
For PC I think wavelength and algae blooms problems are most important.
T5 can change wavelength also but think par decline is more significant.
Certainly if you are running a tank with zero nutrients you can put a plant bulb over the tank and it won't matter nothing will grow....so as you stated it is all a piece of the puzzle.
For beginners, PC is often their first choice in lights due to cost, suddenly after 9 months start seeing an algae bloom, the diagnosis of old bulbs is probably fitting.